Friday, May 2, 2014

For Mummies that might be keen on early childhood education.


English Champ in Bandar Utama is having a free Trial class for mummies that are interested in early childhood education to give their 2-3 year old babies a headstart.

When?  Saturday (3 May) from 5 to 6pm

For reservation, please email Aileen Hoe at aileen@englishchamp.com.my or call 03 7725 9255 / 013 2928 251.

For details, visit www.englishchamp.com.my

Thursday, June 27, 2013

The Day Albert Einstein Most Feared may have Arrived

AND IF IT HASN'T,  IT CANNOT BE FAR AWAY   . . .

 
[]
A day at the beach.

 
[]
Cheering on your team.

 
[]
Having dinner out with your friends.

 
[]
Out on an intimate date.

 
[]
Having a conversation with your BFF.

 
[]
A visit to the museum.

 
[]
Enjoying the sights.

 
[]

It's here!

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Save Bukit Kiara


Many of you who are regulars walking/cycling up Bukit Kiara would have noticed major fencing work on the hill. The way these fences have been put up, has disturbed in one way or another – the flora and fauna of Bukit Kiara.
Friends of Bukit Kiara (FoBK) has been working tirelessly in the last few weeks to highlight these latest activities at Bukit Kiara to the media, NGOs and various communities.
They have also held dialogue sessions with JLN and other Government departments involved.
However, so much more needs to be done as FoBK is only run by a few volunteers.
FoBK need everybody’s support to preserve and prevent further damage to Bukit Kiara.
Please take sometime to read and view the following blog and video for more information.
Those interested to get more involved with this cause may contact the following people:
Dr. Pola Singh – spaul1717@gmail.com
Mdm. Chui Lim – limchuichoo@gmail.com
An event to highlight this cause to Save Bukit Kiara is currently being planned for the 8th of July.
Please visit  http://friendsofbukitkiara.blogspot.com   for more updates

Get up to date on the recent activities and destruction of Bukit Kiara here:

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Malaysia, Do You Still Believe?

Malaysia, Do You Still Believe?



Vivegavalen V Valu
 has 13 reasons democracy isn’t dead post - GE13 ......

The last 48 hours have been gruelling to say the least, what with supposed news of electoral fraud and underhanded tactics employed to win the most closely fought elections since independence –  one could almost be forgiven if an abstinence from politics is all that lingers on a weary mind. However, the message coming out thus far has been discouraging and I fear for Malaysia if her citizens are losing hope. We may have been inadvertently led to believe that there is only one chance left for change but this is not the case. I pen this letter to assure you that there is so much left to fight for, and in light of the 13th General Elections, here are 13 reasons why democracy isn’t dead; far from it, in fact:

1) On the 5th of May, the Election Commission reported that 80%of voters braved the sun and rain to leave the comforts of their home to come out and vote. It did not matter who their support went to – what mattered was the sense of responsibility instilled within Malaysians, that they needed to contribute, to speak up both for this country and its future children. This, to me, is democracy.

2)  Despite all the issues of phantom voters, “Houdini ballots”, blackouts and gerrymandering, the fact is that 51.3 % of the electorate voted for Pakatan Rakyat while 49.7% voted for the Government. The Barisan Nasional coalition knows this, you know this and I know this. The system must be changed and, in the years leading up to the election, must expect the common man to speak strongly about every policy, every decision and every contract that is made or given. 51.8% of the electoral roll is angry that they are not justly represented and are willing to sacrifice even more to contribute to this change in system. This, to me, is democracy.

3) For the second successive election, Barisan Nasionalis once more denied its two-third majority. In fact, Pakatan Rakyat has seen an increase of seven seats, giving them 89 Members of Parliament. Malaysia will not only have an incumbent under pressure but also a strong and capable Opposition who will fight for us. This, to me, is democracy.

4) The Prime Minister in the weeks leading up the 13th General Elections realised  that Malaysians no longer concern themselves with racial issues but rather on the progress of the country as a whole. This in large attributed to the fact that our country appeared to be practicing the format of a Presidential Election. The MCA and MIC banners  were almost entirelywiped out and their leaders too have admitted that the need for reform is real. The move away from racial politics is heartening and given the trend thus far, in time, will totally evaporate. This, to me, is democracy.

5) PERKASA will never again see the light of day in Parliament, for both Ibrahim Ali and Zulkifli Noordin lost. The government knows now that Malaysians are united and will not tolerate racist bigots who were supposedly ‘winnable candidates’. As a citizen of a multiracial country, the drastic change in embracing a more secular approach gives me hope. This, to me, is democracy

6) In a predominantly ethnic Malay constituency, a Chinese candidate won and in a predominantly ethnic Chinese constituency, a Malay won. You only need to look at Pandan, where Rafizi Ramli thumped Gary Lim with a 26,700 majority. Malaysians understand that capability is what makes a candidate successful regardless of their race. This, to me, is democracy.

7) Incapable candidates within Pakatan Rakyat will not be shown mercy and will be purged out. There is no evidence bigger than the loss of Kedah to Barisan Nasional. The state has witnessed poor results and several cases of in-fighting and the people simply got frustrated and wanted better. This, to me, is democracy.

8) Money politics will no longer work and you cannot buy our votes – this is probably the biggest lesson for the incumbent after spending millions on handouts. The fact stands that, despite reports of electoral fraud in her constituency, Nurul Izzah won and she won against a minister known for his splurge in handouts. This will send out a deafening cry to all that transparency and justice will always prevail. This, to me, is democracy.

9) This election was also historic because for the first time, the opposition and incumbent coalitions each presented a populist manifesto with the people’s best interests at heart. Without knowing it, we have successfully demanded for issue-based elections where the focus has been on key areas such as the economy, education and cost of living instead of the usual ethnic-based agendas. This paradigm shift also comes at a time when Malaysia finds itself only seven years away from Vision 2020. The time is now and the promises made will not be so easily forgotten. This, to me, is democracy.

10) It was reported that mainstream media has taken a heavy hit in the last five years and another five years will see many crippled. This is to be expected since media and press freedom is at its worst in our country. However, the rise of our own ‘clictivists’ in various social media platforms has seen millions of Malaysians engaged and well informed prior to the elections. Alternative media is the way forward and any form of bluff can now be called within minutes. This, to me, is democracy.

11)  People Power. The common man arose to walk for a cause they believed in, Bersih or Anti-Lynas, UKM4 or even the “Walk for Freedom” campaign. We made sure our voices were heard, our angst and displeasure shared through peaceful protests with the people who could make a difference. We no longer sat back and passed the responsibility to others with indifference, but instead took control of our fate and reclaimed our country with conviction. This, to me, is democracy.

12) Put aside the criticisms of Barisan Nasional for a moment and you will realise that the party has changed albeit to an insufficient degree. As mentioned earlier, the winds of change are now knocking on their doorstep; it is up to them to embrace it or be left in its wake. The party has been given a rude awakening in a sense, in that corruption and abuse of power will no longer be tolerated but will be fought against with our votes. If the 2008 general elections was a political tsunami, 2013 is the rakyat’s final warning, to change or be changed. This, to me, is democracy.

13) Finally, the biggest positive to come out of all of this is the sense of belonging each of us has for each other and the country. I did not see Malay, Chinese or Indian on Sunday, for I only saw Malaysians. Yes, this election has been tiring and divisive at times but when the dust settles, we return to our schools and work desks, working together for the greater good with the knowledge that tomorrow will bring a renewed sense of optimism and hope for change. To me, this above all is what democracy is about.
The reasons above are only some of the truly inspiring outcomes of this election. As citizens of this blessed country, our role comprises of far more than just a simple tick at the ballot box once every five years. Noam Chomsky got it spot-on when he said that to “some degree, it matters who is in office but it matters more how much pressure they’re under from the public”. It is my humble view that citizen activism is the only way forward and the time has come for us to take matters into our hands, for after all, are they not problems which matter to us most? If memory serves me correctly, Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison – what then is one election if not the beginning?  For now however, we have sent out a clear and strong message: that we will not be silenced, and long may that continue.

The winds of change are coming - embrace them or be left in their wake. 

Democracy is not dead; it is merely plagued with sickness and the cure to this sickness is all of you, the future generation of Malaysia.

 Sincerely,
A Malaysian Who Still Believes

Gross distortions in Malaysia's voting system


Gross distortions in Malaysia's voting system
COMMENT The recently completed May 5 general election (GE13) revealed some interesting facts and figures based on the results as published by the Election Commission.

There have been, for a long time, much criticism of the ‘first past the post' (FPTP) election system we practise in Malaysia, because of what is inherent in this antiquated system.

The FPTP is one of the legacies of the British rule in Malaya and was based on giving all segments of the populace a voice in Parliament. Hence, constituency boundaries were drawn based on this segmental need for representation.
kuala terengganu by election voting day 170109 voters queueThe original intention was noble indeed, that people in Sungai Buloh should have a voice in Parliament, just as those from Shah Alam, even though the Shah Alam constituency may have a population five times larger.

To prevent abuse and disproportional representation, certain limits were set when our founding fathers drew up the federal constitution. One important feature was that there should not be a population variance greater than 20 percent between the smallest and largest constituencies.

This safeguard was gradually eroded by successive ruling governments, since they enjoyed two-thirds majority Parliament to amend the country's laws, until this sanity check on societal representation was totally removed.

As a result of this, today we have 26,000 voters in Putrajaya, Igan (18,000) and Lubok Antu (19,000) commanding the same parliamentary voice as those in Kapar (144,000), Serdang (133,000) and Gombak (123,000).

This hardly seems fair when three small zones command an equal representation in Parliament, compared with their brethren who are at least five times larger, at least from the perspective of a majority rule.

NONE
Disproportionate representation

Criticism of such disproportionate representation led to some countries, such as New Zealand, Australia and Israel, modifying their electoral constituencies to be more representative and hence, the FPTP no longer applies in toto in these countries.

In a related example, besides throwing 90,000 tonnes of tea into the Atlantic Ocean, a new country was born some 237 years ago simply because its ‘rakyat' couldn't accept taxation without representation. One can draw similar parallels, if this inequitable scenario was to ensue here in Malaysia.

The greatest disservice of this FPTP system was shown clearly in Malaysia in GE13 when 915,560 voters in East Malaysia sent 48 BN candidates to our Parliament, or simply put, the average vote cost per BN lawmaker was 19,074.

Because of the severe skewering (aka gerrymandering) of the constituency delineations, it cost an average of 84,053 votes to get one Pakatan Rakyat MP in East Malaysia, or 4.4 times more expensive.
azlanOn the national average, it cost BN 39,381 votes per MP as opposed to Pakatan's 63,191 votes. Quite frankly, Pakatan had to work 60 percent harder than the BN had to.

What this means is that unless the present delineation boundaries are redrawn to fix this severe misrepresentation of societal voice, any opposition will need about 60 percent of the national votes to be on par with BN come election time, forever.

Here, I dare opine that GE13 was largely won by BN by capitalising on the severely disproportional FPTP system, rather than on phantom voters, repeat voters and such. Several jumbo jets full of Bangladeshis, Burmese and Nepalese could not have caused the damage to Pakatan as done by this antiquated Westminster delineation system.

From a strategic point, there should have been more focus in the territories where the opposition could have got more "bang for its ringgit" (pun intended) because the voter distribution and pattern (based on past election results) would have been known upfront anyway.

Admittedly, getting Pakatan's voice to the people in the jungles of Borneo would have been a Herculean task, given the physical and political hurdles.

However, mathematically speaking, if Pakatan had won the same number of seats from the 915,560 voters and maintained the same results in the peninsula, it would be firmly in power now.

Perhaps that's the reason why the BN is believed to have chartered several flights to carry voters from the peninsula to Sabah and Sarawak. I'm inclined to believe that the BN knew, from day one, that this was how it would win GE13.

Some interesting facts

Based on the Election Commission website, let me highlight these other interesting facts from the FPTP vis-à-vis GE13:

1) BN received 46.2 percent of the popular votes in Peninsular Malaysia and 54 percent in East Malaysia, or a national average of 47.4 percent.

2) Based on this, BN was able to garner almost 51 percent of the parliamentary seats in the peninsula and 87.3 percent of those in Sabah and Sarawak, for a national average of 60 percent, or 133 seats.

3) Interestingly, 8.2 percent of the voters (in Sabah and Sarawak) gave BN 22 percent of the parliamentary seats, meaning 39.2 percent of the voters (in the peninsula) gave it the remaining 38 percent in Parliament.

4) Pakatan received 54 percent of the popular votes in Peninsular Malaysia and 35 percent in East Malaysia, for a national average of 51 percent.

5) Based on the above, Pakatan was only able to garner 49 percent of the parliamentary seats in the peninsula and 12.7 percent of that in Sabah and Sarawak, for a national average of 40 percent, or 89 seats.

6) It cost Pakatan 21 percent and 441 percent more votes per MP in the peninsula and East Malaysia respectively, to be on par with BN. On average nationally, Pakatan had to work 60 percent harder per MP than the BN.
azlan7) Because they only formed 29.8 percent of the voters in GE13, contrary to the "Chinese tsunami" conspiracy theory, even if 100 percent of Chinese Malaysians (and for good measure, let's also throw in 100 percent of Indian Malaysians as well) voted for the opposition, there is no way Pakatan could have logically garnered the support of 5,623,984 Malaysians.

Conservatively adjusting for a 25 percent Chinese support for MCA and Gerakan (as was seen where there was a large Chinese voter base), at least three million voters therein were Malay/bumiputera.

This means, conservatively, 42 percent of the Malay/bumiputera electorate in Malaysia actually voted for Pakatan nationally. To put this into proper context, there was no such Chinese tsunami but instead, it was a Malay/bumiputera tsunami because 56 percent of the opposition's votes actually came from the Malays/bumiputera.

For Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to have made this arithmetic blunder publicly was totally ill-advised and it has now caused needless uneasiness among the rakyat.

8) Finally, as explained earlier, 915,560 people, who are basically very removed from urban and national politicking, more or less sealed the fate of 11,054,577 voters or about 29 million people in Malaysia - thanks to the FPTP system.

Seriously and practically speaking, would anybody consider 3.2 percent (915,560) of Malaysians deciding the future of the country a fair run of democracy under the FPTP voting system?

Without a concerted effort from our MPs to make our country fairer by insisting on equitable representation in Parliament, it will indeed be very difficult for Najib to ask for national reconciliation when the very premise of his assertion was fundamentally flawed.

If you don't know what's broken, how can you fix it?



DATO RAMESH RAJARATNAM is a chartered accountant and a keen follower of Malaysian politics.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Safer days ahead?

An interesting update; courtesy of a fellow TTDI-an.
----------

Dear fellow residents of Taman Tun Dr. Ismail,

The 6 May 2009 Malay Mail reported that the police has arrested 6 people in connection with at least 18 robberies in areas which included Taman Tun Dr Ismail.
(Online reference: http://www.mmail.com.my/content/6-held-18-robberies )

The 15 May 2009 Star & NST reported that 4 parang-armed robbers broke into a home at Jalan Datuk Sulaiman, TTDI at around 4am on Thursday, 14 May. The robbers gain entrance by breaking their front grille. The family sleeping upstairs was awaken by the noise of the robbers ransacking the house, went downstairs to investigate, rounded up and tied up by the robbers. Jewellry and 2 cars (Honda Civic & Volkswagen VTI) totalling more than RM400K were stolen.
(Online references:
Star: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/5/15/nation/3910422&sec=nation
NST: http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Friday/National/2557634/Article/index_html )
Advisory: If you hear any suspicious noise in your house during night-time, please remain in your bedroom with locked doors and immediately call TTDI police station at their direct line: 03 - 7728 6222.

The 18 May 2009 Bernama news reported that the Brickfields District Police Headquarters (which also covers Taman Tun Dr. Ismail) would be holding "Meet the Clients" Day on Thursdays from 9am to 2pm beginning this week. It also reported that the recent police blitz on crime has seen the KL crime rate drop by 19.2 % (one month statistics from April 15).
(Online reference: http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/news_lite.php?id=411991 )

The 20 May 2009 Bernama, Malay Mail & Star reported that 2 ruthless robbers / kidnappers were shot dead near the Damansara Specialist Centre (just across the LDP from TTDI). These robbers were responsible for the 10 May 2009 murder of a restaurant owner whose ATM card was used to withdraw RM30,000. In the same shootout incident, a Myanmar was also rescued from possibly suffering the same fate as he was also initially forced to surrender his ATM card.
(Online references:
Malay Mail: http://www.mmail.com.my/content/2-robbers-killed-shootout-damansara-kim
Star: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/5/20/nation/3944693&sec=nation
Bernama: http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsgeneral.php?id=412337 )
Note: I added this news because any TTDI residents could have been potential (dead) targets due to proximity of TTDI to the crime scene as the robbers may have been driving around looking for victims.

The 21 May 2009 Harian Metro reported that a man in his 20s who trespassed into an empty bungalow in Taman Tun Dr Ismail was caught after he apparently fell asleep at around 5.45am. The intruder gained entrance through the back of the house.
(Online reference: http://www.hmetro.com.my/Current_News/myMetro/Thursday/Setempat/20090521061807/Article/print_html )

Lastly, please remember: Crime prevention is the responsibility of all. Do take the necessary steps to protect yourself, your family and your home. Don't provide unnecessary opportunities to the criminals.

Wishing you a safe day every day,

Koo
A resident of TTDI

P.S. If you're not a resident of TTDI or do not wish to receive any e-mail alerts relating to TTDI, please accept my apologies in advance and just reply with the subject heading: 'not TTDI resident'.

If my e-mails are ending up in your spam folder, just add me to your e-mail address book to solve the problem.